Paying College Athletes vs. not Paying College Athletes
There is a high number of controversies in college athletics. Many people think that the college athletes need to be paid due to the huge profits they make for their universities. The NCAA is also not supportive at all because it expects the college athletes to exist by living a sub-human life. This is a loss for the students because they are also expected to complete their courses on time.
Furthermore, there are people who purport that this system should not be changed; however, it is not ethical because the student athlete’s needs have not been taken into consideration.The college athletes have no other means of income. Moreover, the TV networks also make much money through these athletes. This proves that much of the money they make is directed to other areas because they do not receive a penny. In fact, they should be the first beneficiary of the money. This essay argues why college athletes should be paid.
College athletes are supposed to be paid due to many reasons. In most colleges, athletics plays a significant role in providing income for their colleges. In addition, they attract applicants to their institutions. Universities also rely a lot on their athletes when it comes to producing and maintaining the popularity of the name of their school.
However, there is an argument that opposes the idea of paying the college athletes, with the claim that when they get paid, some companies may exploit the athletes for their own profit. They can exploit students by promising them huge packages, and this will eventually make them withdraw from their colleges. Moreover, this can make the athletes become unable to complete their college courses, thus affecting their future:
I used to be totally against it," Self said. "I used to be totally against doing anything other than room, board, books, tuition and fees. But I've changed. And the landscape has changed also. It was always big business; now it's huge business. And when you're sending players from the West Coast to East Coast to play sports, to miss more classes, and the schools benefit from that financially, why shouldn't the people that are responsible for the business, and that would be the student athletes." These are the words of Bill Self, the coach of Kansas basketball. He supported the idea of paying college athletes after noticing the huge amounts of money they create. (Meggyesy 14)
It is not ethical to neglect the college athletes in such a manner because the monies they generate for their institutions entitle them to get some appreciation. They also deserve to get a feeling of how it is to get paid for the services they provide (Meggyesy 24). Alternatively, there are some bodies that argue that college students should never be paid just because they get scholarships for their education. According to them, the scholarships are already a huge reward to them. Hence, there is no need for extra compensation.
It is essential for college athletes to be appreciated because they also directly improve the image of their schools. On the other hand, the money they receive as payment will go a long way in helping them survive while on campus. They will get money to purchase meals and afford accommodation. This will reduce their anxiety concerning the need to look for jobs in order to sustain themselves (Kadupski 54). Another opposing argument is that several athletes are already struggling to deal with fame and success. Some have even indulged into self-destructive behaviors such as engaging in drugs as they try to come to terms with their changed lives (Kadupski 58).
People who are against paying the college athletes usually have non-athletic children. If they had, they would support the idea of those students getting paid. Moreover, they also may have never participated in any sport. If they did, they could understand the amount of time, commitment and self-sacrifice that these college athletes put into their sporting activities. It is not simple to excel in sports. It calls for high discipline and personal initiative (Griffin 13). The college athletes dedicate many hours of their free time to the college sports as they attend to aggressive practice schedules. Also, they must maintain a balance between the sports and their rigorous class schedules. In fact, most of these college athletes are so busy that they lack time for other things such as; going for drives, watching movies or even having a relationship. On the other hand, some people purport that when the students get paid, this will make schools with the major conferences to have an advantage over some smaller schools. With time, problems may arise for the small schools which will become unable to support the athletic programs. Eventually, they would crumble creating a negative image for some schools (Griffin 17).
Students-athletes have to focus on their sports performance, and they get encouraged by their coaches to perceive sports as a profession. This adds to the reasons why they need to be paid. As a matter of fact, most college athletes concur that they need to be paid. Otherwise, there is no need to perceive sports as a profession if there is no payment. It is harsh to deny them the opportunity to make some money by what they do on a professional level (Meggyesy 26). Nevertheless, those who oppose the idea of paying the athletes argue that paying these students will decline collegiate sports. They argue that paying them will cause other problems because their needs are already catered.
Most of the college students take scholarships not because they choose to, but because they have no other means of paying their college fees. Without these scholarships, they would have never even realized their dream of completing their college degrees. In addition, their families also have no means of providing a good level of education for such students. As a result, they get sent to schools with the scholarship where they are expected to survive on their own. It is crucial to note that the athletic scholarship provides room, tuition, board and books. There is no money left for other needs (Meggyesy 28).
With the current debates regarding the issue of paying the college athletes or not, personally I believe that a solution will be found. The universities will have to compensate the students, or they will get paid by the NCAA. After all, college sports will continue to provide more income for big time colleges and universities. In relation to opposition, it is logical for the students to remain unpaid because they also get a free education. This education is funded by the money obtained from merchandise, TV deals and ticket sales, as well as appearances in significant games like the Final Four and Bowl Championship (Kadupski 46).
In conclusion, college athletics plays a significant role in providing income for their colleges. They also attract prospective students to the institutions. Universities also rely a lot on their athletes when it comes to producing and maintaining the reputation of the schooling entity. However, according to the opponents, the scholarships these athletes receive are already a huge reward for them. Hence, there is no need for extra compensation. Nevertheless, the money they will receive as payment will help them survive while on campus. They will; for instance, get money to purchase meals and afford accommodation. College athletes dedicate a huge amount of time, commitment and self-sacrifice to their sporting activities. What is more, most of the college students take scholarships not by choice, but because they have no any other means of reimbursing their college fees. Consequently, it is essential to reward them for the sports they do. This will also motivate them to work hard and promote the image and reputation of their school.